Design’s impact on wellness, prevention, and healthcare.

In the healthcare device and software industry, the mantra: build it and they will come doesn’t work. It hasn’t worked since Noah built an ark or the movie Field of Dreams was made. Ignoring the user experience is what’s wrong with the healthcare experience and begs for innovation.
I recently attended the Continua Health Alliance conference in San Diego. If you’re not familiar with Continua, their current focus is to develop and influence interoperability guidelines and standards for wireless healthcare devices used in the home. Simply put, they certify these devices and ensure they can “talk to each other” and transmit wireless health data over the Web.
They’re making great progress both nationally and internationally. They’ve certified over a dozen devices and have many more scheduled for approval this year. I think Continua’s work is an important step towards the future of mobile health (mhealth) and mobile wellness (mwellness).
Datamonitor, a leading provider of online data and analysis services, forecasts that annual use and spending on telehealth (of which mhealth and mwellness are subsets) will nearly triple over the next three years, from the current $2.4 billion to $6.1 billion in 2012, leading to further healthcare innovation.
Unfortunately, I’m not convinced that Datamonitor’s forecast is realistic, and as much as I support Continua’s mission, I don’t think their current approach is enough to get mhealth and mwellness to the next level of innovation and adoption.
From what I’ve seen and heard so far, wireless industry organizations and their members are not addressing the most important elements associated with the success of wireless healthcare devices and software for consumers: the ecosystem and the user experience.
This was clear when Dr. Eric Topol, Professor of Translational Genomics at the Scripps Research Institute and Chief Medical Officer of the West Wireless Health Institute, posed a question to the audience during his very compelling presentation on 2010 becoming the “year of digital medicine.” He asked, how many people have seen or know about GE’s Vscan™ Ultrasound Stethoscope, the Zeo Personal Sleep Coach™, FitBit™, or PiiX™ by Corventis. Only a few people raised their hands. I was overwhelmed by the fact that the Continua Health Alliance, comprised of over 200 companies, is apparently unaware of the growing personal wireless ecosystem and where their products may or may not fit.
Imagine you have a 65-year-old grandmother who lives alone with congestive heart failure, Type 2 diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD, trying to use a wireless glucometer, blood pressure cuff, pulse oximeter, and peak-flow meter, each from a different manufacturer with a different look and feel, and different software and web interfaces. How long do you think it will take before Grandma throws all these disjointed devices in the garage?
And there’s the rub — a single product approach doesn’t work. The consumer experience has to be emphasized during the design process and has to consider and leverage the entire ecosystem of connected products and services to be successful. Designing and innovating in a vacuum doesn’t work. Innovation is an accretive process and is best accomplished by co-creating products and services directly with consumers.
So while I was at Continua’s conference, I asked many of the companies represented when they were planning on getting consumers involved in the design process. No one had an answer, which was surprising, not least of all because the current healthcare system is broken and the user experience is horrible. I’m reminded of this every time I go to a physicians office and they ask me to hop up onto what looks and feels like a piece of padded plywood with a roll of white butcher paper stretched across it. Great metaphor isn’t it?
When consumers are seeking emergent healthcare and concentrating on getting well they may not be focused on the challenges of this interaction. They’ll put up with the worst experiences. However, it’s a completely different story when consumers are seeking digital products and services to keep them well, because delivering digital healthcare and wellness is completely different than delivering analog healthcare.
At a minimum, here’s what I’d like to see wireless health organizations and device companies do in the coming months:
First, spend a day with consumers that actually have the disease that your devices are addressing. Lay out an assortment of products (from different device companies) for them to use together. I would bet that at the end of the day there would be more than enough “ah-ha moments.”
Second, start thinking about developing a common software interface design language that all certified personal wireless devices should use. This will take interoperability to the next level and provide consumers with the comfort they’re looking for as they customize products and services that work for them.
And third, go out and study the wireless healthcare ecosystem. Understand what’s out there and how your products and services complement others. Remember, consumers want integrated healthcare solutions, not single products.
Wireless health organizations and device companies have a unique opportunity to revolutionize digital medicine in the next few years. It’s time to turn the white butcher paper healthcare experience completely on its head. But it can’t be done unless consumers are invited to be an integral part of the innovation process.
Vincent Salvo, Head of Healthcare Innovation
few points...
David Doherty, 3G Doctor - March 3, 2010
1) Whether people put their hands up says little about market awareness. Maybe the people who kept their hands down felt the question was condescending and an insult of their intelligence.
2) "Remember, consumers want integrated healthcare solutions, not single products". Using this logic BMW shouldn't just stick to cars... after all I'd like a consistent feel across my TV, Fridge, Tumble Dryer and Clothes Line.
3) What's so wrong with the conventional examination couch? What would you like to be examined on a chaise longue or a fainting couch?
...integrated solutions ....
Jorge Lire - March 3, 2010
Maybe not integrated Solutions but compatibility and a coherent semiotic Design. By this i mean that i can buy different gadgets from different brands and i will be able to conect and or use them together without being forced to buy all gadgets from the same brand. This is not only desireable but necesary. And the end consumer feedback is most important to achieve this goal.
Insightful post. We applaud
Ben Rubin - March 9, 2010
Insightful post. We applaud the work being done at Continua to bring together connected health devices - and we hope to be a part of the process moving forward.
Your comments on consumer focus and design are indeed key. At Zeo we have been focused intently on customer needs and have designed the product accordingly. We haven't been as diligent watching customers interact with Zeo together with other products that are involved in their health and wellness. This will be increasingly important going forward - many products and services will be involved and will need to work seamlessly together. The companies that do this well will win the consumer wellness space.
fix url link for http://www.westwirelesshealth.org/
miguel - March 18, 2010
its now sending to http://www.westwirelesshealth.org/) ....
vincent Salvo's article
kayt havens md - March 18, 2010
Vincent, you are right on track. I am a physician loving to play with these devices to see if they create the emotional impact that will engage a person to actually activate and use the system. It needs to be integrated with the whole person not just one point in the data collection because all of these chronic diseases are related. Until the withings.com scale works with daily burn.com with the fitbit.com ( or whatever other devices) etc. (blood sugars, food logs....) it will be hard for anyone to make sense of the information in a way that can encourage change in behavior. Would love to work on something like this from my perspective
Great article...
Dr James Foxlee - March 29, 2010
So many sensor companies and organisations are ignoring the vital “meat in the middle” of end-to-end telemedicine solutions. Even a superficial scan of the market reveals that most sensor companies either (a) leave the data communications/user interaction part off their portfolios entirely (b) provide a static hub offering no or minimal/misguided patient interaction features, or (c) at best use a mobile-phone based solution to transmit data from their device.
All very well for proving concept, but scale to real disease scenarios and it all falls apart. You need to monitor four parameters, each by a sensor from a different manufacturer – and in turn, each of these might support a different handset. Do you provide four mobile phones to a patient, expect clinicians to log in to four different systems to keep track of that patient’s clinical status? Those supported handsets might be obsoleted by manufacturers due to short lifetime of mobile devices – what then? Mobile phones are traceable and insecure, and a commodity open to theft and resale by the very same disadvantaged patients who are most likely to benefit from telemedicine. How is grandma supposed to pair her handset with a Bluetooth BP cuff again if the connection goes down? The list goes on.
Those companies providing patient hubs or even TV-based solutions are well intentioned but horribly misguided. It is clear that these products have not involved patients or clinicians at early phases of the design, or even undergone user acceptance testing. The UK is currently undergoing vast “whole system demonstrator” trials, yet the technology being evaluated is already obsolete and way behind the curve with regards to user experience. They either require high levels of coaching and continual reinforcement, or as you put it, it isn’t long before “Grandma throws all these disjointed devices in the garage”. The preliminary feedback from many UK patients is already bearing this out.
Telemedicine is currently stagnating in the phases of “pilot-itis” and the sensor companies are simply not open to spending money where it is needed. It is necessary to solve the problems of patient and clinician disengagement, by
1) creating a unified platform with a user experience tailored to them and their disease
2) offering context sensitive feedback to the patient and educating them to embrace the technology as part of their daily routine
3) providing real value-add to clinicians by using and analysing the data intelligently, integrating with EMR systems, triage and clinical workflows
4) removing dependency on call / triage centres, most of which are staffed by people with no clinical training
5) ensuring that telemedicine systems don't overwhelm clinicians with "noise"
It needs to be addressed now before organisations spend lots on ineffective technology.
Telemed: is the race on or has it even started?
Alistair Baker - March 29, 2010
If you search on Google for” telemedicine”, the coveted first page is crammed not with vendors vying for eyeballs to position their offerings, its stacked with the web sites of telemedicine bodies and magazines. Dig a little deeper and you will find articles written back in the 90s about how the time for telemedicine is ‘now’. Clearly something, well in fact everything, has not gone to plan.
In part you can blame the maturity of the technology, in part you can blame the lack of a cohesive initiative from leading government health bodies, in part you can also blame the lack of scalable solutions that meet the customer’s needs (those that will pay) and the consumer’s needs (those that will use).
In the UK the recession has resulted in swingeing shortfalls in tax receipts and significant increases in public borrowing to balance the public purse. This is having a direct impact on healthcare budgets allocated from the NHS down to the local spending authorities - yet the demand for services is ever increasing. Telemedicine will lower costs and improve healthcare and the quality of life for those with chronic diseases who today go into the vital sign “data black hole” as soon as they leave a medical institution. Keeping these people OUT of hospital by daily monitoring and analysis of their vital signs will enable data to be fed into healthcare workflow systems and electronic patient records and so prioritise resources based on need, not on a pre-determined time based “your turn” rota.
Whilst plenty is being spent in the areas of electronic patient records systems etc, the field of telemedicine innovation requires a wholesale change in ideology to support the real innovators in the market who have architected the right solutions to address the customer’s and consumer’s needs. Any telemed company in this space who has tried to obtain funding will realise that the ’V’ in Venture Capitalists has dropped off their title and traditional routes to early stage funding are all but closed. BigCo and BigGov should heed Vincent’s warnings and seek out the market innovators and find those companies that can help them deliver the desperately needed breakthroughs in telemedicine to move a labouring vision to a fruitful reality.
If this does not happen, our national healthcare programmes are much more likely to regress than progress. If this proves to be the case it will be a woeful indictment of medical advancements of the 10s+ and a dim future for the chronically ill and aging population whose lifestyle and longevity will depend on the progression of effective healthcare for their senior years.