And Now the Good News

Jessica Jackley of Kiva.org, a micro-financing non-profit, just spoke at TED about finding ways to give and share with the poor. A couple of days ago Nik Marks, a statistician who measures happiness for the Happy Planet Index, showed us the five things that lead to well being — the last was to give. Over and over from the stage in Oxford this year, we’ve heard people say, essentially, “we who live in the West have enough; it’s time to give away our excesses.” Not only that, but by giving we can find more meaning, and more self actualization in life.
This isn’t a new notion. It’s actually been resonating quite a bit over the past couple of years — see Generation M Manifesto (for meaning) and our own “Meaning of Business.” The global financial crisis, the climate change movement, the fight against HIV/AIDS, the Haiti earthquake, the BP oil spill, and other worldwide concerns have become catalysts for doing for others. Social innovation platforms and social design projects are cropping up around the world and are being financed not just by non-profits (which are taking on greater importance lately because of their deep knowledge in social and support spaces), but by quite a few large companies — companies that understand the growing consumer desire to become a part of something transcendent, and thus recognize a viable business proposition.
Interestingly, the idea of giving also has deep roots in theology and spirituality. In the Christian religion, Jesus talked about the need to give to the poor (“It’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter heaven”). Buddha gave away worldly goods to become an ascetic, which eventually led to the Middle Way. One of the five pillars of Islam is charitable giving.
Could the current trend by scientists and intellectuals of reaching out to the world’s troubled places have something in common with religion? Indeed it can. But at the same time, what's happening isn’t religion. There is no god involved; only human nature. Or as my colleague and friend Tom Manning called it the other day, it’s “secular moralism." In other words, perhaps what we are experiencing these days is a different kind of spiritual awakening brought about by a real connection between humans rather than a perceived connection between humans and an ephemeral higher power.
Last thought: interesting how important ideas can be reborn and embraced if they are re-framed.
Photo of Jessica Jackley at TEDGlobal 2010 by James Duncan Davidson.
Good Post!
Marco Puccia - July 15, 2010
First of all: Nik Marks is a SICK speaker! He reminds me of David Brent from The Office UK!
Secondly, thanks for pointing this out -- giving and meaning is an age-old concept! But once we remove the exclusivity that religion or association places on the act, and re-brand it as something EVERYbody can do we find greater adoption! This is the greater trend: the empowerment of the individual who does not need to be a part of an associated group in order to successfully advance an idea or a certain act.
Why create an unneeded division?
Seth - July 15, 2010
The word "moral" doesn't have a secular or non-secular bias until you placed the word secular in front of it. By calling it "secular moralism", you're hurting the topic at hand by artificially creating a topic of secular vs non-secular moralism. And unless that is a subject you want to approach, why step in that direction?
Why create an unnecessary division when you can just call it "moralism"?
Being moral is something anyone can do and always has been able to do. There is no need to rebrand being moral. Maybe people just need to be more careful with semantics and drawing comparisons that are aside the point.
Why not just say "We're finally learning to be moral. We're finally learning to be human."
The irony of this post is
Ironicpost - July 19, 2010
The irony of this post is deep. Jackley, founder of Kiva.org and poster child for the article, is a follower of Jesus.